It seems stupid of me to highlight a post on Grognarida, (cause seriously, who reads my blog and not that one?) But, I couldn't help my self this time. First, there are a lot of voices "on the other side" of how I'd like things to be. I feel it's important to speak up and let be known there's opposition/different way. Second, unlike most issues I agree totally with James points and his arguments for them. And, as is typical, he said it more eloquently than I could.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
All Time Most Popular Posts
-
[ Magic Items Should be Magical originally posted Dec 25th, 2008! A good post, edited and shortened a bit.] Magic Items Are Special Creat...
-
[This post was written by Flip, author of The Paradigm Traveller RPG blog. Payback for the guest post Role Playing Game aides and accoute...
-
Dicecreator posted video update to my DIY Dice post, nice! Looks awesome, thanks for the video.
-
In my Gold and Glory campaign I've created some fluff around standard D&D magic. Which has lead to particular research rules I us... -
or d6+6. Some high number of hit points. Pixie being a Player Character version of some 6-8 inch tall thing with wings that flits about ann... -
"In print" includes in PDF. "1st Edition AD&D" includes OSRIC. To compliment your recently acquired 1st Editi... -
After using Trollsmth's Death and Dismemberment a couple of times in my B2 Caves of Chaos games. I still like it but I've found i...
-
Awhile back friend, who had just seen Mad Max (a great disappointment btw), was bugging me to run a post apocalyptic campaign every time he ... -
Barrowmaze Complete for D&D 5th Edition Kickstarter I've bought the original Barrowmaze, Barrowmaze II, Barrowmaze Complete and...
For what it's worth, I followed the link from here to James' post. ;-)
ReplyDeleteSo, speaking only for myself, I'd be perfectly happy if the old school renaissance didn't attract legions of new players, if doing so means diluting the things I value most about it. History has already shown us what happens when a company makes that particular deal with the Devil. Why would we want to make that same mistake now?"
ReplyDeleteI understand Chevski's sentiments. I have little fear that history will repeat itself: the OGL has seemingly provided that level of assurance.
Yea, verily.
ReplyDelete